“Lukewarm” must mean predictable.

The Road to Character by David Brooks

A Book Review by Marion D. Aldridge

This was a good book for me to read, though I alternated between being energized by it and frustrated.

Brooks is a conservative columnist for the New York Times. Yet, a liberal friend recommended this volume to me. I liked the possibilities of that combination. As a reader, a writer, a political observer, and a theologian/ethicist, I tire of the predictable. Tire. Tire. Tire. I think “lukewarm” must mean predictable. There’s nothing there. Some emperors have no clothes. Blah blah blah…

Brooks is better than that. But “The Road to Character” is uneven. I accept some of what he writes, but it’s pretty random.

I like his premise in the first sentence, that, as we age, we ought to pay more attention to our “eulogy virtues” than to our “resume virtues.” His method, for a few chapters, is to tell the stories of men and women who are successful, who he believes demonstrate character—Dwight Eisenhower, Frances Perkins, Dorothy Day and others. Brooks lifts up certain words as important: perseverance, humility, dignity, and moderation. There also seems to be a lot of dumb luck involved in the attainments of his examples, not to mention some extraordinary intelligence.

Brooks attempts to make a case for character and morality. But it was impossible to figure out which traits I should be emulating. His examples are often people with giant character flaws. I understand that even the best of us have deficiencies, but Brooks’ analysis seems scattershot. What is the takeaway?

Brooks is of the “Life is complicated” school, as am I. Life is full of paradox. But it is the task of a non-fiction author to help the reader work through the contradictions. On one page, he writes, “The more you love, the more you can love.” Okay. Two pages later, he writes, “All love is narrowing. It is the renunciation of other possibilities for the sake of one choice.” How are both true? I have my own opinions, but I’d like for Brooks to help me understand how his ethical framework includes both concepts simultaneously.

Finally, in the last chapter, Brooks produces a “Humility Code” which, like the rest of the book, was fairly ambiguous—seven pages of a bit of this and a little bit of that.

Lots of epigrammatic hints from David on how to live a life of character, but if this was a road, I got lost somewhere along the way.

Categories: Book Review, Faith/Spirituality, Quotations, Writing | Tags: , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , , | 5 Comments

Post navigation

5 thoughts on ““Lukewarm” must mean predictable.

  1. texsc

    I’ve been aware of Brooks for years as the Right-Wing advocate on the PBS News Hour, opposite Mark Shields. As a liberal, I’ve never thought much of Brooks. Then a few months back — probably as the election was drawing near or even after Trump was in — I saw a couple of his NYTimes columns that made me realize he is not as far to the right as I had always thought. Dunno. Maybe Trump drove him a few degrees toward the Left. Whatever. I read a couple of his books, one from some time back whose purposely funny name I don’t readily remember, and “The Road to Character.” I understood most of his personalities in this one. I especially appreciated Frances Perkins and Dorothy Day. But the one I absolutely did not, cannot, understand was George Eliot. She wrote some good novels, so maybe that cut her some slack in David’s mind. But as he presented her personal life, I saw “no redeeming social value,” if I may borrow a quote from a Supreme Court justice of old. Maybe his inconsistencies reflect his personal ambiguities. Thanks for your review.

  2. Marion, you are blessed with more patience than I.

  3. Cuzzin' Peggy

    Hey writer reade. Good view.

  4. James E.(Earl) Williams

    Always enjoy Brook’s comments in interviews and on news panels, ie at times on Meet the Press. Have not read his book but heard him comment on it soon after publication. Interesting….we often expect the profound from the “educated” and erudite when the church custodian may have the best and most meaningful insight.

  5. Douglas Ward

    I had the same reaction Marion. Waded through trusting the cream to rise and somewhat disappointed that the consistency stayed the same. Interesting from a biographical perspective but take aways – not so much.

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

Blog at WordPress.com.

%d bloggers like this: